The 2026 Manufacturing Benchmark Report is built on real, connected-machine data from 508 plants and 10,636 active machines — not a survey. See exactly how your OEE, changeovers, and loss profile compare to real plants in your industry.
No cost. Takes 30 seconds. Straight to your inbox.
Most “state of manufacturing” reports are built from a self-reported questionnaire or a vendor’s marketing claim. This one isn’t. The 2026 Manufacturing Benchmark Report is built from trailing-12-month data — June 2025 through May 2026 — collected directly from real, connected production equipment across 508 plants and 10,636 active machines, supplemented with third-party industry research for outside context. Every fleet-wide number in this report comes from actual production hours, not opinions.
Fleet-wide OEE, availability, performance, and quality benchmarks, broken down by process type, measured against published industry standards.
The single biggest thief of manufacturing capacity across every plant studied — and why it's probably bigger in your own plant than you think.
Why your real changeover cost is likely higher than what your OEE dashboard shows, with a by-industry comparison of frequency and duration.
Automotive, packaging, food & beverage, CPG, and building materials — find your industry, then find your number.
Why most manufacturers aren't turning their data into action, and what that gap actually looks like on a real production floor.
Five specific, data-grounded moves top-quartile plants are making this year, drawn directly from the findings above.
Get an outside benchmark you can bring into your own leadership conversations — a real answer to “is our OEE actually normal?”
The loss-category and changeover data is built in your language — a ready-made case for your next improvement priority.
See plant-floor findings connected directly to the competitiveness and workforce pressures already on your desk.
A: Across 508 real, connected plants studied in the 2026 Manufacturing Benchmark Report, the typical plant runs 56.2% OEE, with the middle half of all plants falling between 41.9% and 69.2%. Published industry research cites a median around 60%, top-quartile around 75%, and "world-class" around 85% — so if your own OEE falls in the 40s-to-60s, you're in line with most real plants, not an outlier.
A: "Unspecified Idle" — machines sitting idle with no reason ever logged — is the single largest loss category across the 508 plants studied, at 29.1% of all loss hours, ahead of equipment failure (16.3%) and setup/changeover (10.9%). The report's core finding is that most plants aren't losing the most time to breakdowns or changeovers — they're losing it to time nobody explained.
A: OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness) is calculated as Availability × Performance × Quality — the share of scheduled time a machine actually ran, multiplied by how close to full speed it ran, multiplied by the share of output that was good. Across the fleet studied in this report, quality is largely solved (98.2%), while availability (63.4%) is where most recoverable capacity lives.
A: TEEP (Total Effective Equipment Performance) measures output against every hour on the calendar, including hours never scheduled to run, while OEE only measures against scheduled time. Across the plants studied, fleet-wide OEE is 53.7% but TEEP is only 26.3%, because only 48.9% of calendar hours are even scheduled for production in the first place.
A: Published industry estimates put the cost of unplanned downtime at roughly $10,000 to $50,000 or more per hour for a typical discrete manufacturer, higher for automotive, pharma, and continuous-process industries. Because these third-party estimates vary and can be dated, the 2026 Manufacturing Benchmark Report presents its own fleet findings in hours and percentages rather than a single blended dollar figure — you can apply your own plant's cost-per-hour to the report's loss data directly.
Use the free Shoplogix ROI Calculator: pick your industry, enter your machines and shifts, and see estimated annual savings and payback in under 2 minutes. Calculate my ROI →
A: No. The 2026 Manufacturing Benchmark Report is built from trailing-12-month, real production data collected from 508 connected plants and 10,636 active machines — 42.9 million hours of actual production — supplemented with third-party industry research for additional context. It is not a self-reported survey.
A: Yes, significantly. Across the six manufacturing verticals studied, automotive plants averaged the highest OEE (71.5%), while food & beverage plants averaged the lowest (45.2%) — a 26-point spread — with each vertical also showing a different dominant loss category (for example, blocking/starving in food & beverage vs. changeover time in packaging and CPG).
A: Not necessarily. In 5 of the 6 manufacturing verticals studied, the highest-volume plants (by production hours) actually ran at a lower OEE than the typical, median-sized plant in that same vertical — most notably in food & beverage and CPG. Scale does not automatically translate into efficiency.
A: Yes — the 2026 Manufacturing Benchmark Report is a free download; you'll be asked for your work email and a few details so Shoplogix can send it to you and follow up with related resources.
This report is built on the same real-time, connected-machine data available on your own floor. Download it now — or skip ahead and get a personalized benchmark of your OEE, loss profile, and changeover performance against your industry peers.
Prefer to talk first? Book a benchmark assessment